| |
Robert Bullard Press Clipping
Back to Clippings Archive main page
Sealing the deal
Community charters can improve areas by engaging residents and setting
out councils’ responsibilities. Robert Bullard reports on successful
schemes. (Local Government Chronicle, 22nd May 2008)
REJUVINATE COMMUNITIES
Over the past five yeas, an evolving agreement between the City of York
Council and local residents has helped rejuvenate a run-down housing
estate. Bell Farm Estate was one of the most unpopular estate in the
city, with high levels of crime and unemployment. Despite a shortage of
affordable housing, the estate found it hard to attract residents.
“In 1995 the estate was one of worst places to live in York,” says Liz
Levett, the council’s acting head of neighbourhood management.
As a result, an action project to improve its appearance was followed by
an agreement on services between residents and the council.
That agreement has evolved and is now one of the longest-running in the
country. New agencies have become involved, such as the youth service,
at the request of young people. In line with the national Respect
agenda, the agreement sets out how residents can be good neighbours and
what agencies will deliver.
Ms Levett says key to keeping residents engaged was commitment from the
agreement’s monitoring group.
The agreement has enabled the estate to thrive and changed the way
services are delivered, for example housing repairs are now a higher
priority. “Sometimes it is small things that really upset people,” she
says. “They can bring an area down, but can easily be solved.”
CONSULT HARD-TO-REACH GROUPS
In Kidderminster, a group of 16 young people aged between 13-16 have
drawn up a charter as a way to change the way their age group is
perceived in the community and to help agencies work more effectively
with them.
In the document, young people from the Oldington & Foley Park junior
pathfinder project give their assessment on the area by scoring local
agencies, identifying what has improved and what has worsened over the
last two years. They also describe their aspirations for the future. “It
is a really useful document,” says Dave Evans, an operational manager in
Worcestershire CC’s youth services. “The young people came up with some
creative ideas worth listening to.”
The charter works as a toolkit for local agencies, providing a checklist
for them to follow when asking young people their views. The council
found they wanted to be involved in decision-making, and the charter
provides guidance on what sort of activities young people want.
“Very often people have a negative view of young people,” says Sarah
Turner, the pathfinder co-ordinator. “But they are not all bad and have
done a wonderful piece of work.”
The document has been distributed to the area’s 2000 households. It
reminds young people of their rights and responsibilities, and gives
them space for writing comments to help guide agencies how to help them.
LEARN FROM RESIDENTS
Oldham MBC used a community agreement to encourage residents in Medlock
Vale to take the initiative in solving local problems such as dirty
streets.
Maxine Moar, the council’s community participation co-ordinator, says
residents were relying on the New Deal for Communities regeneration
programme, and “we saw the development of an agreement as a way to
inform them how they could solve things themselves.”
An agreement covering street cleanliness, the community’s number one
concern, was launched in February. “We were quire surprised,” Ms Moar
says. “Residents wanted ‘naming and shaming’ and other initiatives, so
that people would take responsibility for their actions.”
Since the start of the process, the council has placed particular
importance on identifying the roles and responsibilities of the
community. “If they are not involved, they will not buy into it and it
will not work,” says Ms Moar.
The agreement has been a learning exercise for both sides. Council staff
have had to translate their mission statements to jargon-free
quantifiable services they will deliver.
Meanwhile the neighbourhood team of 40 actively involved residents has
been trained in problem-solving and communication skills, so that they
can better represent the views of fellow residents at meetings.
Four other agreements, covering issues such as crime and housing, will
follow.
SET OUT SERVICE STANDARDS
A neighbourhood charter for Eastern Road in Brighton built on the area’s
former neighbourhood renewal programme.
“We already had the structures for engaging people, and had conducted a
survey of neighbourhood needs, from which we had prepared an action
plan,” says Nicky Cambridge, neighbourhood manager at Brighton and Hove
Council. “We saw the development of a charter as meaningful, deliverable
and quick.”
The charter reflects the needs of the local population, which is
dominated by older people, and a lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender
community. Issues such as fear of crime, and hate crime, receive
particular attention.
Putting service standards onto paper proved an extremely useful exercise
for the council. The exercise showed that some service standards were
out of date, and some managers were anxious about publishing their
commitments.
The voluntary sector and police have been supportive of the charter, as
have the councillors, who see it as a way to champion their role.
BUILD TRUST WITH THE COMMUNITY
Staffordshire Moorlands DC discovered that building trust with local
communities is key to successful charter agreements after piloting a
‘Community Pride’ initiative in the rural Waterhouses area.
The council found that there was already considerable community activity
in Waterhouses. “They had a very active and successful village agent for
five years, who provided capacity building to support local groups,”
says Sue Edbury, the council’s locality partnership officer.
One of the challenges was that the community had already achieved so
much, according to Ms Edbury. “The community has got to feel you want to
help them rather than you are there to hijack their ideas. Once you have
built trust they are more likely to ask for your help.”
Among the lessons learned by the council was that a scheme’s success did
not depend solely on resources. The first problem that Staffordshire
Moorlands tried to fix for the rural community was clearing a long
stretch of unsightly roadside daisy-like plants called butterbur – only
to discover that it was a protected indigenous plant.
“It is not always about money and manpower,” says Ms Edbury. “Other
things can get in the way.”
As a result, the council and local community are working more closely
than before. Other issues are now being addressed in the area another
Community Pride initiative is being piloted in an urban ward of
Staffordshire Moorlands.
Find out more
City of York Council
Liz Levett, acting head of neighbourhood management. Tel: 01904 551527
or e-mail: elizabeth.levett@york.gov.uk
Worcestershire CC
Dave Evans, operational manager, youth services. Tel: 01905 765417 or
e-mail: devans1@worcestershire.gov.uk
Oldham MBC
Maxime Moar, community participation co-ordinator. Tel: 0161785 9716 or
e-mail: maxine.moar@oldham.gov.uk
Brighton and Hove Council
Nicky Cambridge, neighbourhood manager. Tel: 01273 291738 or e-mail:
Nicky.Cambridge@brighton-hove.gov.uk
Staffordshire Moorlands DC
Sue Edbury, locality partnership officer. Tel: 01538 483672 or e-mail:
sue.edbury@staffsmoorlands.gov.uk
© Robert Bullard. Not for reproduction without prior permission
Back to Clippings Archive main page
top of page |
|